For critical IoT deployments (smart city, industrial sites, fleet asset tracking), private LoRaWAN networks are often preferred over public operators: full infrastructure control, contractual SLA, stronger security and no commercial dependency on a third-party operator.
True
Public networks remove the need to invest in gateways and offer immediate coverage, but they bill per device on a SaaS basis (typically EUR 1-5 per device per year) and the SLA is rarely meaningful. Private networks give full control over coverage, performance and security, with a guaranteed SLA — at the cost of gateway hardware (roughly EUR 500 per gateway, with 10-20 gateways for an average smart-city deployment) and operational responsibility for the Network Server. A common hybrid approach combines private gateways on the customer site with roaming onto a public network for mobility — particularly useful for fleet asset tracking that leaves the campus.
Quote the total cost of ownership over five years rather than the up-front gateway price; in fleets above a few thousand devices, private LoRaWAN is almost always cheaper than per-device SaaS billing.
LoRaWAN bank in preparation
The full LoRaWAN bank isn't available yet. Drop your email to get notified at launch and grab an early-bird discount.
Join the waitlist →See the 9 other LoRaWAN practice questions
Related questions
- An important distinction must be made: "LoRa" is the physical-layer radio modulation (CSS, Chirp Spread Spectrum, proprietary to Semtech), whereas "LoRaWAN" is the MAC-layer protocol and network architecture (an open standard from the LoRa Alliance) built on top of LoRa.1. Architecture · LoRa vs LoRaWAN
- LoRaWAN uses a "star-of-stars" topology: each end device transmits unidirectionally toward ALL in-range gateways, the gateways forward the packet to the Network Server, which deduplicates the copies; there is no mesh between end devices.1. Architecture · Star-of-Stars-Topologie
- As of 2026, the main public LoRaWAN operators in France are: Orange Live Objects (near-nationwide coverage), Bouygues Objenious (in sunset), Helium Network (community-driven) and Loriot (Swiss-based commercial Network Server vendor, not a public carrier). In addition, many deployments are run on private networks (dedicated infrastructure).6. Network providers · Öffentliche Betreiber
- Typical LoRaWAN smart-city use cases include: smart water meters, parking-bay occupancy sensors, fill-level sensors for waste bins, public-lighting telemonitoring, air-quality stations, EV charger monitoring (status and energy readings — not the OCPP charge-control protocol) and flood alerts — a typical LoRaWAN sensor costs between EUR 30 and EUR 150.7. Use cases · Smart City
- In building retrofits, LoRaWAN competes with EnOcean for energy sub-metering and wireless monitoring (temperature, CO2, presence): long range (one gateway covers a large building), 5-10 years of battery life on the sensors, but higher latency (Class A).7. Use cases · Gebäudemonitoring