LoRaWAN uses a "star-of-stars" topology: each end device transmits unidirectionally toward ALL in-range gateways, the gateways forward the packet to the Network Server, which deduplicates the copies; there is no mesh between end devices.
True
Each end device broadcasts its uplink without targeting any particular gateway. The Network Server then receives N copies through the N gateways that heard the frame, keeps the best one (typically the strongest RSSI/SNR) for downlink scheduling and drops the duplicates. The main benefit is intrinsic gateway redundancy and robustness, since adding a gateway only improves coverage without any device-side reconfiguration. The trade-off compared with mesh stacks like Thread, Zigbee or Z-Wave is that LoRaWAN end devices cannot communicate directly with each other — every message has to go up through the infrastructure.
When you add a gateway, do not migrate devices to it manually; the Network Server will simply pick the best gateway for each uplink, which is why field surveys focus on contiguous coverage rather than gateway assignment.
LoRaWAN bank in preparation
The full LoRaWAN bank isn't available yet. Drop your email to get notified at launch and grab an early-bird discount.
Join the waitlist →See the 9 other LoRaWAN practice questions
Related questions
- An important distinction must be made: "LoRa" is the physical-layer radio modulation (CSS, Chirp Spread Spectrum, proprietary to Semtech), whereas "LoRaWAN" is the MAC-layer protocol and network architecture (an open standard from the LoRa Alliance) built on top of LoRa.1. Architecture · LoRa vs LoRaWAN
- As of 2026, the main public LoRaWAN operators in France are: Orange Live Objects (near-nationwide coverage), Bouygues Objenious (in sunset), Helium Network (community-driven) and Loriot (Swiss-based commercial Network Server vendor, not a public carrier). In addition, many deployments are run on private networks (dedicated infrastructure).6. Network providers · Öffentliche Betreiber
- For critical IoT deployments (smart city, industrial sites, fleet asset tracking), private LoRaWAN networks are often preferred over public operators: full infrastructure control, contractual SLA, stronger security and no commercial dependency on a third-party operator.6. Network providers · Öffentlich vs. Privat
- Typical LoRaWAN smart-city use cases include: smart water meters, parking-bay occupancy sensors, fill-level sensors for waste bins, public-lighting telemonitoring, air-quality stations, EV charger monitoring (status and energy readings — not the OCPP charge-control protocol) and flood alerts — a typical LoRaWAN sensor costs between EUR 30 and EUR 150.7. Use cases · Smart City
- In building retrofits, LoRaWAN competes with EnOcean for energy sub-metering and wireless monitoring (temperature, CO2, presence): long range (one gateway covers a large building), 5-10 years of battery life on the sensors, but higher latency (Class A).7. Use cases · Gebäudemonitoring