In Europe (EU868), the ETSI EN 300 220 regulation typically limits the duty cycle to 1 % per hour on the main sub-band, which caps the number of frames an end device can transmit (from a few dozen to more than two hundred per hour depending on the spreading factor).
True
On the EU868 main sub-band (868.0-868.6 MHz) the duty cycle is capped at 1 %, which means roughly 36 cumulative seconds of transmission per hour per device. Other sub-bands range from 0.1 % to 10 % depending on the channel. The practical consequence is heavily dependent on the spreading factor: at SF7 (fastest) a device can fit approximately 200 messages per hour, whereas at SF12 (slowest) only about 10 messages per hour are possible before exhausting the budget. On top of the regulatory duty cycle, many networks apply a Fair Use Policy that is even stricter than the ETSI limit.
Calculate your time-on-air budget at the worst-case spreading factor before deployment — ADR will eventually lower SF in good conditions, but the device must respect the duty cycle from its very first transmissions at SF12.
LoRaWAN bank in preparation
The full LoRaWAN bank isn't available yet. Drop your email to get notified at launch and grab an early-bird discount.
Join the waitlist →See the 9 other LoRaWAN practice questions
Related questions
- An important distinction must be made: "LoRa" is the physical-layer radio modulation (CSS, Chirp Spread Spectrum, proprietary to Semtech), whereas "LoRaWAN" is the MAC-layer protocol and network architecture (an open standard from the LoRa Alliance) built on top of LoRa.1. Architecture · LoRa vs LoRaWAN
- LoRaWAN uses a "star-of-stars" topology: each end device transmits unidirectionally toward ALL in-range gateways, the gateways forward the packet to the Network Server, which deduplicates the copies; there is no mesh between end devices.1. Architecture · Star-of-Stars-Topologie
- As of 2026, the main public LoRaWAN operators in France are: Orange Live Objects (near-nationwide coverage), Bouygues Objenious (in sunset), Helium Network (community-driven) and Loriot (Swiss-based commercial Network Server vendor, not a public carrier). In addition, many deployments are run on private networks (dedicated infrastructure).6. Network providers · Öffentliche Betreiber
- For critical IoT deployments (smart city, industrial sites, fleet asset tracking), private LoRaWAN networks are often preferred over public operators: full infrastructure control, contractual SLA, stronger security and no commercial dependency on a third-party operator.6. Network providers · Öffentlich vs. Privat
- Typical LoRaWAN smart-city use cases include: smart water meters, parking-bay occupancy sensors, fill-level sensors for waste bins, public-lighting telemonitoring, air-quality stations, EV charger monitoring (status and energy readings — not the OCPP charge-control protocol) and flood alerts — a typical LoRaWAN sensor costs between EUR 30 and EUR 150.7. Use cases · Smart City